Fall Quarter at Evergreen
Well, there have been many moons since I last posted, and if Vatz, K2, and Sean (especially Sean, real happy to have you back buddy) have started posting again, then I suppose I should post a few as well. I'll try to keep each post sort of themed to different spheres of my life.
First, my new graduate program. It is set up more like a training program than a graduate school, which I like. We have workshops and seminars on various readings, with the work flowing more or less seamlessly. We spent the last fe
w months studying educational theorists. The history of schools, developmental psychology, educational philosophy, a little bit of methods, and so forth. We also learned how to research (which was a great deal of review for me, so I helped my classmates instead) and we will continue to write conference papers that will be published by the end of the program. My topic is Urban At-Risk Dropout Prevention, and I'll be sure to make it available to anyone who wants to read it.
In the meantime, if you'd like to see some of the work that I've done, and work I will be doing, I'm maintaining a website here. It's mandatory, but good practice in website creation.
Overall, I like the program. Faculty is pretty supportive, it's just challenging enough to push me, and we're covering a lot of material that doesn't get looked at in other programs. Is it all necessary to becoming a good teacher? Probably not, but I think some of it will help and some has made me rethink some beliefs I've had for a while. I'm already getting a little impatient; I want to get out there and start teaching, but I think that's largely because I'm jealous of Sean with all he's been writing lately. It's odd, because I'm one of the youngest in the program, but I feel behind my peers in some way.
The atmosphere and attitudes of some of the people and focus of the program does have a tendency to aggravate me a bit. I'm aware that I'm very much in the dominant group, being white, male, hetero, mid-twenties, etc, and what that means. I understand that I can't fully grasp what the life of someone who is not in that dominant group has been like, but at times in the program I've felt that I'm supposed to be ashamed of this for some reason and that my opinion doesn't count for much because it's skewed to the dominant group. It's incredibly frustrating and, well, aggravating. It's really only a few individuals, so I'm trying not to let it get to me too much. This coming quarter is entirely devoted covering these issues, and I hope that it can be framed in an accessible way.
First, my new graduate program. It is set up more like a training program than a graduate school, which I like. We have workshops and seminars on various readings, with the work flowing more or less seamlessly. We spent the last fe

In the meantime, if you'd like to see some of the work that I've done, and work I will be doing, I'm maintaining a website here. It's mandatory, but good practice in website creation.
Overall, I like the program. Faculty is pretty supportive, it's just challenging enough to push me, and we're covering a lot of material that doesn't get looked at in other programs. Is it all necessary to becoming a good teacher? Probably not, but I think some of it will help and some has made me rethink some beliefs I've had for a while. I'm already getting a little impatient; I want to get out there and start teaching, but I think that's largely because I'm jealous of Sean with all he's been writing lately. It's odd, because I'm one of the youngest in the program, but I feel behind my peers in some way.
The atmosphere and attitudes of some of the people and focus of the program does have a tendency to aggravate me a bit. I'm aware that I'm very much in the dominant group, being white, male, hetero, mid-twenties, etc, and what that means. I understand that I can't fully grasp what the life of someone who is not in that dominant group has been like, but at times in the program I've felt that I'm supposed to be ashamed of this for some reason and that my opinion doesn't count for much because it's skewed to the dominant group. It's incredibly frustrating and, well, aggravating. It's really only a few individuals, so I'm trying not to let it get to me too much. This coming quarter is entirely devoted covering these issues, and I hope that it can be framed in an accessible way.
3 Comments:
At 13:05,
Sean said…
Hey Buddy,
It is good to be actually teaching and I am really enjoying the experience. But as I go I also realize how much learning there is to be done. I mentioned this at the end of my last blog, I think...but its one thing to know literature and how to write and its one thing to know how to construct a lesson and run a classroom, but its another to know how to make a 14yr old who doesnt like to read and isnt very practiced be able to identify themes in literature.
Its interesting to see how all of the different education programs work. I like that I spent 4 years studying literature, then studied education. But people at the teacher factories (Millersville, West Chester, etc.) are given the more practical skills of this is how you teach this skill in your subject area, because they have 4 years of studying it. At the same time, without experiencing the challenges first hand and being able to try solutions, I would get bored and frustrated pretty quickly I imagine.
Anyway...it seems like your program will have you very prepared, and I think there is a value in all of the philosophy and history of education. We need to remember Dewey and Freire as we continue down the slippery slope of standardized testing.
At 13:11,
Sean said…
I also wanted to throw a few articles your way.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1568480,00.html
I liked this article a lot. I have the opportunity to write a curriculum for a class at my high school at the end of the month and I'm going to try to incorporate as much of these concepts as possible. Jamo also told me a story of a place he observed at while at PSU that had one teacher for all core subjects (7th + 8th graders--obviously a very bright guy) where most studying was based around large, intensive group projects.
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/nr/downloads/ed/TheSilentEpidemic3-06FINAL.pdf
I havent read this yet, but it looks promising. The Gates Foundation is doing some great things in experimental education.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12532668/site/newsweek/
This article was somewhat interesting, but kind of a dissapointment to me. I would have preferred a more in-depth study of a few of the more successful schools, particularly those with higher F&R lunch stats. But perhaps you can google some of those schools to find some profile pieces on what makes them successful.
At 13:14,
Sean said…
damn...
Newsweek: http://tinyurl.com/r2rzx
Gates Foundation: http://tinyurl.com/yhx5b2
Time:
http://tinyurl.com/ub33l
Post a Comment
<< Home